Farm Animal Welfare Impact Evaluation 2026
Farm Animal Welfare Impact & Sustainability Evaluation

FARMWISE Impact 2026

FARMWISE Impact 2026 is an NGO-led corporate assessment of major Japanese companies to evaluate the degree to which their farm animal welfare initiatives have an “impact” on actual welfare improvements. Impact” in this evaluation refers not only to the existence of a philosophy or declaration, but also to the establishment of a system that leads to improvements in the breeding environment and management through the specificity of policies, implementation status, scope of application to the supply chain, risk management, and level of information disclosure. Animal welfare responses are also connected to social sustainability, and this assessment is also a framework for identifying their social impact.
FARMWISE Impact 2026 is not intended to be a simple ranking. It is intended to visualize the achievement, challenges, and structural gaps of Japanese companies in comparison to internationally required animal welfare standards.

questionnaire

FARMWISE Impact 2026 16 Questions

1Overall policy on animal welfare for livestock and fishery products1Is animal welfare included in the key issues?1unknown
2Designate animal welfare as one item
3Designated as part of items such as sustainable procurement
2Do you designate the transition to or increase in vegetable or alternative proteins as a key issue?1unknown
2Designated as a single item
3Designated as part of items such as sustainable procurement
3Do you have an animal welfare policy?1unknown
2There is a stand-alone policy.
3There is reference to another part of the policy.
4Is in-house training on animal welfare provided?1unknown
2Some departments do.
3We do this for all of our employees.
5Do you ensure traceability of livestock and marine products used by your company so that the animal welfare status of animals can be traced back to the farm or slaughterhouse?1unknown
2Efforts are made to ensure traceability of animal materials utilized.
3Partial traceability of livestock and marine products to be procured is ensured.
4100% traceability of livestock and marine products procured
2Procurement policies and practices to switch animal materials coming from closed confinement and intensive systems6Are there any initiatives related to AW-conscious pork sourcing?1Position is not clear or unknown.
2Percentage of pork procured or produced that is gestation stall free
3There are initiatives related to pregnancy stall-free
4Aiming to switch to gestation stall-free pork procured or produced in the future
5Announces target year to switch to gestation stall-free pork procured or produced
6Reporting Progress Toward Pregnancy Stall Free
7All pork procured and produced is gestation stall-eliminated
7Are there any initiatives related to sourcing AW-conscious eggs?1Position is not clear or unknown.
2Percentage of eggs procured are cage-free.
3There are initiatives related to cage-free
4Have a goal of increasing the percentage of cage-free eggs
5Aiming to abolish cage keeping
6Target year for elimination of cage keeping has been announced.
7Reporting progress toward elimination of cage keeping.
8Cage-keeping has been abolished.
8Are there any initiatives related to sourcing AW-conscious chicken?1Position is not clear or unknown.
2Knowing the stocking density of the chicken to be procured and the percentage of chicken with or without prior loss of consciousness at the time of slaughter
3There are efforts to reduce stocking densities.
4Have a goal of reducing stocking density below current levels.
5Chicken meat to be procured now has a stocking density of 33 kg/m2 or less
6There are initiatives regarding the implementation of prior loss of awareness at the time of slaughter
7Have a goal of 100% implementation of pre-slaughter loss of consciousness
8100% of the chicken meat currently procured is pre-slaughter awareness loss at the time of slaughter
9There are cases of pre-consciousness loss by gas stunting at slaughter.
9Are there any initiatives related to sourcing AW-conscious shrimp?1Position is not clear or unknown.
2Knowing if ocular resection is practiced in the breeding grounds of the shrimp to be procured
3There are efforts related to the abolition of shrimp ocular resection.
4Has a goal to procure breeding shrimp in the future from farms that do not perform ocelliectomies.
5obsolescent
10Are there any initiatives related to the procurement of AW-conscious milk and dairy products?1Position is not clear or unknown.
2Have a goal to ensure traceability to the farm
3Pasture-raised milk and dairy products are handled (including organic JAS)
4We are trying to be tether-free.
5Aiming for pasture-raising.
6All dairy products handled are pastured.
11Are there any initiatives related to sourcing AW-conscious fish?
*ASC or higher certifications for high animal welfare https://www.ali.fish/certifier-campaign-resources/benchmark-2025
1Position is not clear or unknown.
2ASC certified or sourced from farms in ASC-certifiable environments
3Aiming for 100% sourcing from ASC-certified or ASC-certifiable aquaculture farms in the environment
4Have a goal of 100% implementation of pre-slaughter loss of consciousness (percussion or electric shock)
12Do you procure and sell foie gras? Or do you have a procurement policy for foie gras?1They procure foie gras.
2Position is not clear or unknown.
3They are deciding to repeal it.
4obsolescent
13Are there any initiatives related to AW for animal products other than pork, eggs, chicken, shrimp, milk/dairy products, fish, and foie gras?1not (verb-negating suffix; may indicate question or invitation with rising intonation)
2be (usu. of inanimate objects)
3Policies and Practices Concerning Conversion from Animal Materials14Are there any initiatives regarding alternative proteins?1Position is not clear or unknown.
2Selling products with alternative proteins.
3Have a goal to increase replacement protein
4Developing alternative proteins.
15Are there any initiatives regarding alternative dairy products?1Position is not clear or unknown.
2They sell alternative dairy products.
3Have a goal to increase alternative dairy products
4governance16Do you engage with animal welfare stakeholders?1not (verb-negating suffix; may indicate question or invitation with rising intonation)
2be (usu. of inanimate objects)

Disclaimer: Please read this before using the site and data.

Share this page